ShareAppeal has a new blog!

ShareAppeal Blog

ShareAppeal Blog
I’ve been working on ShareAppeal for almost a year now, and I’ve had a tough time using this blog for several different things. But this is ultimately my personal blog, and using it for ShareAppeal announcements never felt quite right. I decided it’s time it has its own product blog. So here it is, the new ShareAppeal blog on Tumblr!

The ShareAppeal Blog

I’ve already copied the old ShareAppeal posts from this blog to that one, and I just posted a nice write-up on the new Twitter Integration feature.

From The Archives: RAMSTICK

What’s the point of this post?

Well, I found this old abstract and thought it was interesting, so I’m posting it.

I’ve been interested in technology for a long time 1. I’ve also been pretty good at anticipating new technology, but spent a long time thinking about coming technology without trying to capitalize on it 2.

That officially changed when I started following Apple in 2008 (I couldn’t resist the iPhone 3G). I had a pretty good sense of where the firm should go, and I decided to make sure to record my thoughts so that I could compare the outcome to my actual predictions. I also bought some Apple stock in early 2010 (at $250/share) so I could finally make money on my predictions.

Before I started following Apple, I made several predictions that were pretty good, but they were usually just in passing conversations with friends. 3 In 2001, I had an idea for something I called “RAMSTICK”. I am going to copy and paste my original abstract below 4 because it’s pretty entertaining (I’m painfully formal, and it’s obvious I’m a pretty green college student). Note that there are several typos 5 that I’m not correcting because I’m literally copying and pasting the abstract below.

RAMSTICK

General Idea:

A “stick” of non-volatile memory that can be used for high-capacity storage of digital information. This stick would be small (1″ x 2″) and would be “hot-swappable” via a slot on a PC or other computing device. This stick would be similar to RAM (as in the memory in a PC or the sticks used for currently MP3 players and other portable, digital devices).

Reasons for RAMSTICK:

The RAMSTICK would be superior to current large-capacity technology because it could be used as an easily portable medium for large quantities of information.

It could be used for long-term storage of large quantities of information because it would be non-volatile and would be less sensative to extreme temperatures than current technolgies. This more tolerant temperature characteristic would be due to the difference in materials used to construct the medium.

This technology would have no moving parts, thereby making it less succeptible to loss of information by jolt, or high “G” subjection. This would make it more practical for hot-swapping and transporting than current technology.

This technology would be significantly faster than current “platter” based technology. Because there are no moving parts and all data transfer and access is based on electrical impulses and not moving parts. Access time would be significantly reduced, thereby increasing overall execution time for fetch and store instructions.

Foreseen difficulties with achieving this technology:

One of the limiting factors on RAM thus far has been the difficulty in storing easily accessible information in such a small space. It will prove difficult to make a small chip, based on current methods of RAM production, that will store large quantities of information (upwards of 4 gigabytes and perhaps as large as 60 to 100 gigabytes).

Possible solutions to foreseen difficulties:

It may be necessary to design a new compression scheme for this technology. Perhaps if an efficient, dependable, large-scale compression can be accomplished, the large amounts of data as seen by the user may be reduced to smaller amounts of data capable of being stored on a RAM-like medium.

It may also be necessary to reconsider current memory-chip technology with respect to layout, materials and production techniques. It may be necessary to use new materials to achieve smaller electronic “parts”, so that more information may be exchanged and stored in a smaller amount of space.

Short summary of benifits to RAMSTICK:

Speed
Portability
Durability
Hot-swapability

Possible, specific uses:

This technology may be particularly benficial to modern server technology. Servers are regularly in need of “backups” and often have several hot-swappable storage drives to help ease the flow of large amounts of data to and from teh servers. Also, many servers currently necessarily utilize a “raid/SCSI” drive configuration to help speed access time for the information that is often accessed by the server. This technology would eliminate the necessity for “Raid/SCSI” interfaces as the access time of the information would be dramatically reduced. Because of faster acess time and the durability of this technology, backups would be quicker, more dependable and more easily stored. Also, once this technology is explored, simplified and expanded, there could be less of a need for frequent backups because of larger storage capacity.

This techology could also be used for other purposes such as storage of high volumes of information that may need to be accessed quickly. An example might be a chip designed for home movie viewing similar to DVD, but on a smaller, faster medium capable of higher bandwidths of information, thereby enabling the technology to be more intricate and subsequently more appealing to the entertainment driven consumer.

Genral purpose:

The general purpose of this technology would be to help alleviate the problem with current technologies’ slow access times. Platter and laser based technologies are all based and dependant on moving parts. Moving parts are slower, less dependable, more volatile and more likely to break than technologies based solely on electrical impulse without burden of moving parts. This technolgy, because of its lack of dependance on moving parts and its subsequent boost in access time could open doors for significantly higher bandwidth, thereby helping to move techology into a higher-bandwidth, more detailed era.

Reflecting on this abstract, 11 years later

I sent this abstract to a couple friends, and even tried to get one of my electrical engineering professors to look it over to see if we could do something with the idea. He totally blew me off, so I shelved it. A year later, a friend of mine emailed me with a link to a site that was just selling the first thumb drives and a subject of something like, “Look familiar?”

It turns out I was really describing two technologies that would emerge over the next several years. First, I was obviously describing thumb drives, which have run up to the sizes I described (they’re available in 64GB+ sizes now). Of course, thumb drives had become commercially available a year earlier, but I didn’t know that at the time 6. Second, I was describing SSDs, which are quickly becoming ubiquitous in mainstream consumer products (first in smart phones and portal devices, and now in larger capacities like the one in my MacBook). Again, this technology had existed for a while before I imagined it, but I was unaware of it.

I think I pretty much nailed thumb drive technology, but I missed a little bit on the SSD side. I anticipated the technology serving as an easy server backup mechanism, but it turns out SSDs are just generally more useful than HDDs. They’re providing a much broader service than just server backups.

Apple iPhone Lull: Screw-up or growing pains?

Henry Blodget at BusinessInsider.com wrote “Okay, Can We All Now Please Agree That Apple Screwed Up With The iPhone?” in response to Apple’s unusually lackluster quarterly earnings report for Q3 FY12. He makes some good points, but he’s missing a huge factor regarding iPhone’s release schedule and how it’s changed over time: the Verizon iPhone.

He cites two contributing factors that hurt iPhone sales this year. I’ll just quote him:

  • First, Apple switched (or delayed, depending on who you listen to) the launch of that year’s new iPhone to the fall instead of the June releases it had had in prior years. This “delay” took many people by surprise, and it also kept the then-current version of the iPhone, the iPhone 4, on the shelves for three months longer than people had expected. This contributed to a sharp fall-off in iPhone sales in the summer months, as the “4” began to feel stale and customers waited for the new version of the iPhone, which almost everyone assumed would be the “iPhone 5.”
  • Second, when Apple finally released the new version of the iPhone, it was not the iPhone 5–it was the iPhone 4S, which didn’t look or feel much different than the iPhone 4. Although the iPhone 4S was a great phone and sold very well initially, it was soon leap-frogged in some respects by new, bigger phones from Samsung and others. And now, with Samsung’s very-well received Galaxy S3 out there, the current iPhone looks decidedly small and old. So much so that the “air pocket” in iPhone sales appears to have started one full quarter early this year and will therefore wallop both the June quarter and September quarter, while customers wait for the iPhone 5.

Summary

It’s possible that Apple screwed up with the iPhone, but probably not in the ways Blodget describes. At the very least, there are some factors he left out of his analysis. If Apple did screw up, it was by making a calculated decision to introduce the iPhone to a new US market on Verizon’s network. It’s obvious that Apple saw Verizon as an opportunity to open up the iPhone market in the US, and they took the opportunity. We don’t know the details of either the AT&T or Verizon contract, so it’s tough to know for sure what Apple was working with when they decided to release the Verizon iPhone 4 in February 2011, four months before the next “standard” iPhone release date.

I’ve already written about why the 4S release was expected and appropriate. I won’t spend any more time on that. 1

Apple delayed the 4S release until the fall instead of the summer

Here are the iPhone release dates so far 23:

  • iPhone – June 29, 2007
  • iPhone 3G – July 11, 2008
  • iPhone 3GS – June 19, 2009
  • iPhone 4 – June 24, 2010
  • iPhone 4S – October 14, 2011

Apple was remarkably consistent with release dates until the 4S. What happened? I actually kind of cheated above – there’s a release I didn’t include:

  • iPhone 4 – June 24, 2010
  • Verizon iPhone 4 – February 10, 2011
  • iPhone 4S – October 14, 2011

Apple needed to move out from under the exclusive AT&T contract, and open up the iPhone market in the US. This “How Apple’s Revenue Stacks Up” chart shows pretty flat-looking iPhone revenue from late-2010 into mid-2011. I couldn’t find numbers Verizon vs. AT&T iPhone unit sales, but my guess is that AT&T iPhone sales tailed off in early 2011, and were overtaken by Verizon iPhone sales through the first half of 2011.

It seems like Apple’s exclusive AT&T contract was still in place when the original iPhone 4 launched in 2010, delaying Apple’s move to Verizon until February 2011. Then they could start selling on Verizon immediately or wait for the iPhone 4S later in the year. They chose to sell on Verizon immediately rather than wait.

The downside to this decision was it left Apple in a bit of a pickle: their normal release cycle would put the iPhone 4S release around June 20, 2011 – only four months after the Verizon iPhone 4 was released. That would probably make the Verizon iPhone 4 adopters pretty angry, so they delayed the 4S until October 4.

In this context, it’s obvious to me that Apple made a calculated business decision: in order to expand its US footprint by adding new carriers, they released the Verizon iPhone 4 in February 2011 – only a few months before the typical iPhone release window. Then they bumped the 4S release until October in order to avoid angering customers who just bought a shiny new Verizon iPhone 4. Apple knows first-hand how angry people get if they release a new gadget, and then immediately undercut themselves (either on price, or by releasing another new gadget).

I think Apple wants to release iPhones at the end of Q3 or beginning of Q4 (fiscal), but they had to slip the 4S to keep new Verizon adopters happy. The 4S was released in October 2011, and I expect the iPhone 5 to be released in September 2012 (or sooner). The 5S will probably come earlier (August) and so on until the iPhone is back in the late-June/early-July sweet spot that Apple has used in the past.

Apple released the 4S instead of the 5

This is pretty simple, actually, and I’ve written before about how Apple cycles hardware and software updates to remain competitive while continuing to produce the best products. 5 I think Apple has a pretty clear pattern of this.

iPads so far:

  • iPad
  • iPad 2 (body changed significantly, much faster processor, different look and feel, smart cover, etc.)
  • “New” iPad (pretty much the same form factor, added Retina, a little speedier, not much else)

And they’ve followed a similar pattern with MacBook Pros.

  • (First gen) Original MacBook Pro – 2006 (spec bumps followed)
  • (Second gen with big change) Unibody MacBook Pro – 2008
  • (Spec bumps throughout 2009 before…) Big spec bump on MacBook Pro – 2010
  • (Third major iteration) MacBook Pro with Retina, SSD, thinner form factor – 2012

My point is that there really wasn’t any reason to think the 4S would be a 5. That’s just not how Apple does things. 2011 was a year for big software updates (including Siri) and a spec bump for the iPhone 4 (to the 4S). I also think releasing the iPhone 5 right after the Verizon iPhone 4 would have been a mistake. The way Apple did it, the Verizon iPhone 4 users could think, “Well, the 4S looks pretty neat, but I’ll just wait for the 5.” rather than, “WHAT?! I just bought the iPhone 4 and now it looks obsolete?” Meanwhile, a lot of new iPhone users bought the 4S or upgraded 6, so 4S sales were still strong. The iPhone 5 will sell like hotcakes, and eventually Apple will get back to its normal iPhone release cycle. I don’t think they have screwed up with the iPhone, they’re just experiencing growing pains as they seek greater market penetration in the US.

Wynn win-win: Recapping my first good tourney score in a while

As you may have seen on Twitter, I (basically) won a $550 tournament at the Wynn last weekend. I gotta say, it felt really, really good, especially given how I ran in 2011. I won’t recap the bad beats (you can read about last year’s WSOP and my trip to Seattle for that stuff), but I will say that I was really, really down on poker when I got to Vegas this summer. I had conversations with Luckbox Larry where he mentioned that he and another friend thought I looked really miserable at the poker table. “I am miserable.” is what I told him. Just sitting there, folding, looking forward to a chance to get it in as an 80% favorite so I can take another bad beat–that’s no fun. Of course I look miserable.

Anyway, things finally turned around last weekend. I’m going to do a sort of merged recap here. I was tweeting on breaks, and a lot of interesting stuff happened between breaks that I didn’t tweet about. I’m also going to try to keep this pretty short, but I’m frankly writing this for myself more than anyone else, so you’ll have to indulge me. This was my biggest score so far, after all. I want to remember it.

If you want to read this without all the poker commentary, you can just scroll through to see the stuff in block quotes and see the pics. If you want to read more about the details of hands I played and how the tourney went, then you can read between the block quotes.

Back to the Wynn

Over the years, the Wynn has been a pretty reliable place for tournament success. It generally has pretty soft fields and they’re smaller, so cashing isn’t too difficult. Still, I ran kind of bad there last year and had a grueling six hours in a Saturday $550 tournament there a few weeks ago. And yet, I went back.

@JoshDoody: Back to the Wynn for another $550 tourney because I hate money and like getting cold cards and watching my stack dwindle over several hours.

But I was determined to make this one different. Beforehand, I told Luckbox Larry, “You know what? I’m going to play good poker today. I’m not going to be all careful, playing cautiously to hang around and get lucky. I’m going to be aggressive, make moves and either put together a run or go down in flames.” I was determined to play well, and to make my opponents hate me.

As I’ve mentioned on Twitter (and probably on the blog), I spent the past year writing a book about heads-up tournament strategy, and I really learned a lot while writing that book. Much of what’s in the heads-up book is directly applicable to full ring tournaments because, in the words of one of my co-authors, “If you’re playing full ring right, most of the pots you play are heads-up anyway.” You just shrink your playable hand range (and do the same for your opponents) and heads-up strategy is very applicable to full ring tournaments.

So, I learned a lot about heads-up strategy, and I thought I could apply it to full ring games. One of the benefits of writing a book with professional poker players is I get to talk poker with professional players a lot. I went into this tournament focused and really “seeing the ball”. My plan was to play aggressively, be tricky against good opponents, and use position to abuse people. I did all those things, and did them pretty well.

During the first few levels, I played a few pots, but one hand was memorable and it set the tone for the tournament. I used a move called a “flat-float-bluff” (FFB) to win a decent pot with a crummy hand. A FFB is where an opponent in front of me raises and I flat-call his raise (usually with a weak hand). The opponent will typically continue betting (c-bet) on the flop, regardless of his hand. The “float” is where I call that c-bet without a real hand, planning to win the pot later on. If the opponent was indeed betting with a weak hand on the flop, he’ll often check the turn, and that’s when the “bluff” comes in. This move can be very effective against opponents who will give up if they missed the flop and their c-bet gets called.

This time, I actually used a flat-float-bluff-bluff (FFBB) since I had to fire two barrels (one bluff on the turn, another on the river) to win the hand. I won this one with a combination of moxie and a tell I picked up on my opponent. When I went to execute the “bluff” on the turn, there were three hearts on board. I had K2o for total air and no heart draw, but I continued with the plan to bluff anyway. As I was counting my chips to make the bet, my opponent grabbed some “calling chips” and held them out as though he were definitely calling if I bet. This tell can mean a few things depending on the situation, but in this case I knew it meant he was trying to intimidate me into checking instead of betting. He had some kind of decent hand, but probably not a great hand, and couldn’t stand to call a bet on the turn and a bet on the river. He was trying to slow me down so he could get to showdown cheaply. I was pretty sure he did not have a heart draw because of the action in the hand, so I figured he must have something like a one-pair type hand. The river was another heart (putting four hearts on the board), and my opponent checked to me again. I was pretty sure I would win if I bet (because I didn’t think he had any hearts), but I took my time grabbing my chips because I wanted to see if he’d do the same thing where he held out “calling chips” before I bet. He didn’t, so I knew I had a green light to bluff and take it down.

@JoshDoody: We started the @wynnpoker tourney with 17.5k chips. I made the first break with about 18k after getting up to 25k and misplaying a hand.

The hand I misplayed was an interesting hand against a good player who was directly to my right. I flat-called his pre-flop raise because I had position. I don’t remember what I had, but I think it was something like 65s. There was one other player who saw the flop, which was something like K83. The first player checked, the raiser bet out (“c-bet”, which just means he continued betting as is expected of the pre-flop raiser if it’s checked to him on the flop). I called his bet with nothing (another “float”), hoping the first player would fold, and I could steal the pot on the turn (I’m trying another FFB). The turn was a boring card, my opponent checked, I bet, and he check-raised me so I had to fold.

My mistake was that I should have folded on the flop when he c-bet. He had rarely c-bet before that hand, so I could be reasonably certain he had a pretty good hand when he c-bet on the flop. This wasn’t the time to make the “flat-float-bluff” move, especially since he’d seen me win a pot with a similar line a little earlier (the FFBB with K2o on the four-heart board). This would set up a pretty big hand later.

Right after the first break, I had to 3-bet and fold to a 4-bet from Luckbox Larry. The opponent I 3-bet was the same solid opponent I had failed to flat-float-bluff in the hand I misplayed earlier (above). I suspect he began to realize that I was playing aggressively in position on him, and he was suspicious. That’s the setup for this next hand.

My opponent (the good one on my right) made a standard raise from the hijack seat (HJ; the seat two to the right of the button), and I flat-called in the cutoff (CO; the seat one to the right of the button) with Td9d. I think everyone else folded. The flop was all diamonds (something like J42), giving me the medium flush. My opponent c-bet (bet out), which is a standard play, but not one he usually makes (see above). He usually won’t c-bet (which is why I played the hand so badly earlier). I would normally want to raise with my flush to define his hand (his reaction to a raise on that flop would tell me quite a bit), but also to take control of the hand so I could dictate whether we bet the turn (because hopefully he would check to me on the turn if he called my raise on the flop). I decided to call since it seemed he had a real hand, and he might put me on a float if I just call on this board.

The turn was an offsuit king, which was a pretty good card for my hand. If I was ahead on the flop (which was very, very likely), I was still good on the turn (I didn’t want to see the board pair, or a diamond). My opponent checked to me, and I had to bet because I couldn’t give him a free card to see the river and possibly counterfeit my flush. I was nearly certain my flush was the best hand, and I couldn’t afford to slowplay anymore. Also, I had made this same play earlier, and he caught me (the flat-float-bluff) making the move, and he had seen me take this same line against another player earlier (when I had K2o and did a flat-float-bluff-bluff). This was the perfect situation to bet and hope he was trying to trap me. Sure enough, he check-raised, I moved in, and he called. It turns out he had KK, so he had turned a set of kings. That was a big pot that gave me a lot of chips.

@JoshDoody: I have 45k on the second break. Playing good, aggressive poker, earning pots with bluffs and getting lucky occasionally. Who is this guy?!

There was one really interesting hand during these levels. I raised in middle position with AQo, and only the big blind (an aggressive European player) called. I’ll skip straight to the river (we both checked the flop Qc9c8x, he bet at me when another club hit the turn, and I called). On the river, the board was Q984x with four clubs. So I had top pair, top kicker on a four-flush, straightening board. The problem I had was that my hand was “pretty good” (top pair, top kicker is a pretty good hand in a heads-up pot). But there were a lot of hands he could have that beat mine. My opponent’s lead on the turn indicated a semi-strong hand that might be trying to protect against a club draw. On that board, “semi-strong” means several hand that beat top pair, top kicker. On the river, My opponent checked to me, and I often would have just checked back, hoping my hand was good, but I decided that was a bad idea. He could have some dinky little club, or even a weak two pair that he was afraid to bet. The bottom line was there were a lot of hands that beat mine that would fold if I made a good bet. On that board, he would have to fold sets, two pair, little one-club hands and even a straight. So I decided to turn top pair into a bluff. I made a largish bet and he folded.

This isn’t a super remarkable hand except I think I would often have checked there in the past. But checking is a mistake much of the time because I can get so many better hands to fold by betting. I didn’t make that mistake and I earned a pretty nice pot. I’m pretty sure my opponent folded a better hand because he mumbled something that Luckbox Larry overheard… seemed like he might have laid down top two pair. I was feeling pretty good after that hand. I had been chipping up almost all day, and played pretty good poker.

A few hands later, I raised with 92s in late position, and ended up winning a decent pot, but I had to show the hand. (I c-bet the flop, bet again on the turn, and gave up on the river. My opponent had been calling with various draws that all missed, so I had to show my third pair of nines with a deuce kicker to win the pot.) This was a problem because now everyone knew I was raising trash in late position (which I had been for a while – the blinds were pretty tight and folded way too much).

The result was that I had to snug up a bit and hence didn’t grow my stack very much before dinner.

@JoshDoody: On dinner break with ~62k, and average is ~40k. I’m playing well and winning most of the big pots I play (which is lucky). 30 left, 10 pay.

After dinner, I continued to play pretty tight thanks to my image being trashed with 92s earlier. I still managed to chip up, but it was mostly just luck: I happened to pick up hands in the big blind to bust some players who moved in with short stacks. I don’t remember playing too much poker during this stretch. Just sort of sat back and let the cards do the work.

@JoshDoody: We’re on the last break of the night. 21 left, average is 65k, I have 125k. Playing and running well. I should be Top 5 in chips. 10 pay.

@JoshDoody: They broke my table. I got AA the first hand at my new table. Held up against KK for a monster pot. Chip leader with ~250k. 14 left, 10 pay.

This was the first and only time I had AA, KK or QQ in the tournament. Lucky for me, I got AA against KK, AND he had more chips than I did (there were probably only two or three people with more chips, so this is very lucky), AND my AA held up. This was pure luck and it worked out really well for me. I was monster chip leader with 14 people left.

Unfortunately, things would turn ugly for the last level of the night. This next tweet says it all.

@JoshDoody: JJ < KK, a blind vs blind gone bad, raise/fold with 88, flat-float-bluff fail and I'm down to 124k (above avg) with 12 left. Back at noon.

I beat myself up pretty bad after this run of hands, but I was probably a little hard on myself. The JJ < KK hand was blind versus blind. It was folded to the small blind who had literally moved all-in probably six times since I sat down at my new table. He had been showing good cards, but was still pretty short. He had about 40k left (remember, I had 250k, and average was around 100k, so he was pretty short), and moved all-in. I looked down at JJ and had an easy call. Of course, he had KK and it held up, so there goes 1/6 of my stack.

The next hand, I was in the small blind and it was folded to me. The big blind only had 29k left and I think we were at 1,500/3,000 with a 400 ante. Translation: He was very short, short. I looked down at J7o and decided I could move in and take the blinds pretty easily. The player in the big blind had been playing really tight, so I expected him to need a good hand to call.

He thought for a few seconds and called with… Q6o. I’m not sure why he called. That’s clearly not a calling hand, and he was a tight player. He just decided to go with it, I guess. Of course Q6 held up and I lost another 30k. Down from 250k to 180k in two hands.

About five hands later, I was in early position and opened with 88 (we were six-handed). A tight player two to my left moved all-in, and I ended up folding. He later told me he had TT. Another 10k gone.

The last hand of the night, an aggressive player in early position (we’re still six-handed) made his standard raise to 9,500. I flat-called on the button with KTo (I think this is fine six-handed, and a 3-bet would be totally acceptable as well). The flop was Q94, giving me a gutshot straight draw and an over card (and king high, which could be good). He c-bet and I floated. The turn was another four, and he checked, so I bluffed for 21k (just about half pot). I’ve now tried a FFB… and he called. The river was another queen, so the board was Q944Q. He led out for 40k and I thought for a while and folded. I almost called with king high there, but just decided it would be awful to go to Day 2 with 80k chips, below average. I may have lost a leveling war because I’m pretty sure my opponent knew I would think that way, and that may be why he made that bet. He may also have had a hand, but I kind of doubt it. Who knows.

Day 2

@JoshDoody: Our table draw for Day 2 of the Wynn $550 is here (ugly pic): [The link is already broken.] @hugepoker and I are at the same table. I’m 5th in chips.

Luckbox Larry and I did a lot of research on our Day 2 table, and it turned out I had a pretty bad seat between two good players. We were only six-handed, so this was a bad seat draw, especially since Luckbox Larry was also at my table. I’m pretty sure our table was significantly tougher than the other table.

We also decided to swap some equity since we both had the same chip stack and we were on the bubble. This is a pretty unusual swap because equity swaps usually happen before the tournament starts. But since we were on the bubble and had similar stacks, we decided it would be prudent to hedge by swapping some equity. Basically, we were trying to ensure that at least one of us would get something as long as one of us cashed.

It all turned out to be moot because we literally played one hand before two players (one at each table) busted and we made the money.

@JoshDoody: Made the final table at the Wynn. I’m guaranteed a min-cash, going for the $11k first prize. (cc James Di Virgilio) https://twitter.com/JoshDoody/status/219511016785059840/photo/1

Once we made the final table, we redrew for seats, and my seat draw was much better. The good player to my left moved over to my right. The good player that was to my right moved across the table from me.

You’ll also note that I’m wearing a suit for the final table. I did that just because several of my friends back home told me I had to change something up to stop running bad. I decided I would dress up to show the final table I meant business (and to show them that I only had one outfit resembling a costume).

@JoshDoody: 9 left. I’m below average and need to win a pot (it’s been a while).

I was card dead for quite a while at the final table.

@JoshDoody: 8 left. I stole the blinds once, so hanging in there.

The card-deadness continued down to eight left. Stealing the blinds was worthy of a tweet, so that paints a pretty clear picture of how my cards were. I’m pretty sure we played down from 12 left to eight left, and the only pot I won was this blind steal.

@JoshDoody: 7 left AND I knocked out number 8 with KQs > 99 ( I won a flip!). I’m still pretty short, but not desperate anymore. (UPDATE: 6 left)

I was getting really short-stacked, and an under-the-gun opponent moved all-in when I was in late position. I would normally not call all-in with a hand like KQ, but this particular opponent had been moving in a lot, and I thought there was a pretty good chance I had him dominated (I think KJ, KTs, QJ were in his range). I could also essentially remove AA and KK (and maybe QQ) from his range because he moved in quickly when it was his turn to act. Most players will have to think, “How can I maximize my chances of doubling up with these aces?” before they move all-in or raise. He didn’t take enough time to think that over, so I could be pretty sure he didn’t have a monster. Given the fact that I could have him dominated and that he was unlikely to have me dominated, I decided to put my chips in with KQ. Turns out we were in a coinflip and I hit a king on the turn to bust him (I barely had him covered).

@JoshDoody: First break of the day. Still at 6 left and I’m either 5th or 6th in chips. Need to get lucky now.

After the KQ > 99 hand, I went back to being pretty card dead and folding a lot. I also had the misfortune of having an extremely aggressive (and good) European player on my right, and he was frequently moving in on me if it was folded to him in the small blind. Since he was moving in so frequently, I knew I could open up my calling range quite a bit from the big blind, but my cards were far worse than what I would need to call an all-in (even against a guy who’s basically moving in with any two cards). I had 62o and 84o a lot during this stretch for some reason. There was a two-orbit stretch where I had a two in my hand in all but one hand.

@JoshDoody: 5 left, and I knocked out 6th (AT > 73o). I’m 4th in chips. @hugepoker is chip leader with more than 450k. I have about 170k.

This was another gift like I received a few times on Day 1. It folded around to a late-position, short-stacked opponent who moved all-in when I was in the big blind. I woke up with AT and had to call. I was lucky to have another 70/30 hold up (my fourth or fifth of the tournament).

This is the kind of “good luck” you need to win a tournament: you have to avoid getting unlucky in crucial pots. Yes, I’m supposed to win a 70/30 most of the time, but winning four or five of them in a row is really good luck. I also had the good fortune that when I lost these hands, I usually had my opponent well covered, so it didn’t do serious damage to my stack.

@JoshDoody: 4 left, and I knocked out 5th place (A6s > KQo). I have about 315k, avg is 270k. Pretty sure I’m 2nd in chips. @hugepoker is chip leader.

Speaking of the really aggressive European player to my right, he finished in 5th place. It was folded to him on the button, and he moved all-in. I had been playing tight in the blinds, and so had the guy to my left, so this was a really good spot for him to move in with a pretty wide range of hands. Again, I normally wouldn’t call all-in with A6, but I knew I was ahead of his range, and I was short enough that I had to take a chance to win a pot and bust a player when I could get it. It turns out he had KQ, so I was ahead, and my hand held up again (this time in a 60/40). More good luck.

@JoshDoody: Took a nasty beat four-handed (AKo < K5o -- he rivered a straight) that would've made us 3-handed. Down to 6 BB, now back to almost 20 BB.

This was a devastating hand, one of those 70/30s you have to win to win a tournament. The player to my left was first to act (I was big blind), and he moved all-in for about 240k. It was folded to me, I woke up with AK and had an easy call. Not only did I lose the hand, but I lost it in a nasty way: he made a straight on the river (with his five). The next tweet says it all…

@JoshDoody: Forgot to mention that if my AK holds up, we’re three-handed and I’m probably chip leader. Still in it and playing great poker.

I would’ve been around 520k if I won that hand, and we would’ve been three handed (“we” being Luckbox Larry, a short stack, and me). Luckbox Larry and I had a goal of getting heads-up for the win, and this hand would have made that an almost-lock. We were this close to being one and two in chips with three left, but the poker gods didn’t smile on me this hand.

After this hand, I was left with something like 60k chips, and the blinds were (I think) 5k/10k with a 1k ante. I was desperately short-stacked and would need to get seriously lucky to win the tournament.

All that said, I have a very clear and effective short-stack strategy that I’m very comfortable executing. My biggest hurdle after this hand was psychology–it would have been really easy to just give up. While a 6BB stack is really, really short, there’s still room for skill to help me get back in the game. I needed to keep my head and not tilt.

This is one of the better aspects of my game: I have extreme patience (sometimes to a fault) and rarely tilt, even after horrendous beats. This beat was one of those rare bad beats in a tournament where I could actually calculate how much money it cost me. A 4th-place finish would pay $3,500, and moving up to 3rd would pay about $5,000. If my AK held up, it would have earned me $1,500. Instead, I was by far the shortest stack, staring at a 4th place finish.

Fortunately, I kept my head and played my short stack long enough to make the next break so I could catch my breath and settle down (we were about 20 minutes from the break when I lost this hand).

@JoshDoody: Second break of the day. Still four-handed and I’m the short stack. @hugepoker just took a nasty beat to chop with AT = A5 in a 560k pot.

Meanwhile, Luckbox Larry had a chance to win a huge pot and become chip leader, and it was a similar situation: he was a 70/30 favorite. But the board double-paired to counterfeit his kicker, and he ended up chopping (splitting) the biggest pot of the tournament with two pair, ace kicker. This was probably almost as deflating for him as my AK < K5 hand was, except he didn’t actually lose the hand. Suddenly, we were both running bad at the worst-possible time.

@JoshDoody: We just chopped it up four-handed. I got the lion’s share: ~$8,200. Everyone else got ~$6,500. Technically… I won? https://twitter.com/JoshDoody/status/219590756048973824/photo/1

But fortunes can swing quickly at the final table because the blinds and antes are so large relative to the chip stacks. I had worked my stack up to over 200k (from 60k after the bad beat earlier), and we all seemed to have between 200 and 300k chips. One of the remaining players (we called him “red shirt” because… he was wearing a red shirt) asked if we wanted to talk about a deal (distributing the prize money in some way rather than playing the rest of the tournament). As he started to mention it, the dealer was already dealing a hand, so we decided to wait until after that hand to talk about a deal.

Unfortunately, he won a big pot with AK > AJ (against Luckbox Larry), and ended up being massive chip leader after that hand. “Never mind. It doesn’t make sense now because I have so many chips and a chip-chop wouldn’t work.” So we would play on. A couple of hands later, I doubled through “red shirt” to take a massive chip lead (AQ > … A5, I think? — I won another 70/30). We were ready to talk “deal” again, and I ended up getting the lion’s share of the chips.

I had some friends ask me what happened at the end–why we didn’t play it out. The reason is that there’s a lot of variance (big swings in chip stacks) late in tournaments when the blinds get high. These last few hands illustrate that pretty well. Luckbox Larry had a huge chip stack, then suddenly he was short and “red shirt” had a huge chip stack, then suddenly he was short and I had a huge chip stack. That all happened in like four hands.

Since 4th paid only $3,500 and first was $11,500, there was a lot of money on the line, and we were basically gambling for it. In order to reduce variance (and to avoid “losing” a pile of money), we decided on a deal: I would get $8,200, “red shirt” and the guy to my left would each get $6,500, and Luckbox Larry would get $6,400 because he was really short-stacked. The primary beneficiary of this deal was Luckbox Larry – he got more than he probably should have, but that’s just because he’s good at negotiating deals. I probably could’ve gotten a few hundred more dollars, but I didn’t want to risk losing the deal. I was hoping to land at $8,500, but ended up at $8,235. I’m happy with the way things turned out.

@JoshDoody: A decent shot of me forcing a smile (holding it for like 30 seconds). And some cash. Also, I’m wearing my magic suit! https://twitter.com/JoshDoody/status/219613236952170497/photo/1

That’s an awful picture of me that’s out of focus. Also, I literally had to hold that “smile” for like 30 seconds before the dealer took the pic, so my typically non-photogenic smile is even worse than usual. Bad smiles aside, it was nice to end up with a little pile of cash, my biggest tournament score yet.

Gizmodo’s Jesus Diaz dives into a well of hyperbole, gets caught under the Surface

Jesus Diaz over at Gizmodo has a piece up entitled “Microsoft Surface Just made the MacBook Air and the iPad Look Obsolete“. I know what you’re thinking: “Josh is such an Apple Fanboy. Of course he couldn’t stand for such blasphemy!” And it’s reasonable for you to think that’s my reaction. True, I think the article misses the mark, but not for the reasons you might think.

I was actually hoping he might be right, or at least that Microsoft had actually created a real competitor for the iPad. The iPad was released in 2010 and has totally dominated the tablet market ever since. In many ways, Apple created the tablet market, at least as we know it today, and there has yet to be a real competitor. As an Apple Fanboy, this makes me feel really good about being in Apple’s camp (and owning Apple stock); as a technology consumer, it’s kind of frustrating.

We need the competition

We really, really need good competition to keep things moving forward. In fact, if we consider the cell phone market before the iPhone was released in 2007, we see a really good picture of what happens when the incumbents get complacent and stop competing with each other, or start competing exclusively on price. By 2007, most cell phones were just the same old cell phones, created to enable service providers to continue selling service and text messaging plans. The cell phone market had become sort of like the “razor model“, where the cell phones were basically free and the service was an expensive recurring fee that service providers could collect (the service being the blades).

Then the iPhone came along, and we’ve had five years of furious competition among manufacturers, including some actual obsolescence of brands and companies (Nokia and RIMM being the latest apparent casualties in the war). Apple showed that there’s money to be made by competing on quality, and phone manufacturers immediately started going after that money.

Five years on, we’re still looking for that iPhone killer

There have been many, many such articles about the next great phone. Remember the Atrix? The BlackBerry StormStorm 2? The first Droid? The Droid 2 (I think they’ve made four of them now)? The new Razr? That’s just in the past couple years. There’s even this piece about Motorola’s coming iPhone killer (beware manufacturer marketing hype). What ever happened to that? The EVO? Lately, we have the Galaxy S and its progeny, which seem like decent phones, but have yet to really dent Apple’s market share or profits.

Despite all these potential iPhone killers, the iPhone is still alive and well, selling more and more units every year. My point is that these are pretty good phones, but that calling them iPhone killers, or claiming they’ll make the iPhone obsolete has proven to be blatant hyperbole. The manufacturer says it’s an iPhone killer, makes a bunch of promises, but then the phone is actually here and everyone forgets about it, starts making excuses for it, and eventually moves on to the next big thing.

Jesus just got duped by the hype, and possibly an urge to publish good linkbait

So the idea is that Microsoft, having failed to beat Apple in the phone market, is moving into the tablet market and hit a home run on their first swing? They suddenly figured out how to beat Apple at the tablet game and made the iPad obsolete on their first try? C’mon.

How on earth could Jesus possibly know that? Most of his article is just nitpicking small things that he doesn’t personally prefer. He doesn’t like some of the skins in the apps (I agree with him there). Windows 8 doesn’t have those skins, so Surface is better? An unreleased OS on an unreleased device has defeated iOS by simply using better skins in some of the native apps? Who knew it was that easy? He also spends a lot of time talking about how amazing the keyboard/trackpad is, although he hasn’t used it yet (because Microsoft hasn’t let anyone use it yet – there’s definitely nothing suspicious about that, right?).

All he’s really doing is taking Dieter’s Ten Principles, loosely applying them to a vague device, and then firing ad hominem attacks at the iPad. I think it’s a shame he spent so many words writing about the Surface when he really doesn’t know anything about it except what the Microsoft Marketing Department told him. If we’re comparing marketing copy, can anyone beat Apple at anything right now?

All previous iPad competitors have failed despite great hype

Comparing a real device to Microsoft’s new unicorn device’s marketing and announcement is just kind of silly. Companies have spent millions of dollars hyping their devices as the next big tablet, but none have delivered (not even close). The Playbook (look at the “No Like” section for more on its dearth of apps 1), Galaxy Tab (Samsung’s best shot after two years of trying) and Fire (that review was six months ago, and the Fire has since fizzled) have all failed to have any real impact on iPad sales. So why take the bait on the Surface?

In 2010, Jesus wrote a very similar piece on the iPad (applying Dieter’s Ten Principles to the original iPad). His main beefs were the lack of a stand, fingerprint-showing display and aluminum back. I assume the Surface will have fingerprint issues (I’m not sure) since it is also controlled by touch. The iPad’s Smart Cover (released with the iPad 2) is a really clever stand that is also a cover, but the iPad’s back is still aluminum. Of course, I don’t think there’s any way he can know if the back of the Surface will be durable enough that he can just drop it anywhere as he wanted to do with the iPad in 2010. So Microsoft may address Jesus’ issues from the 2010 iPad, but the iPad has come a long way since then. The Surface isn’t competing with the original iPad, it’s competing with the “new” iPad.

I want to believe, but I can’t get past the cries of “Wolf!”

I want to believe there’s a real iPad competitor coming. I really do. That would be good for me and other iPad owners because it would force Apple to continue innovating. But I don’t see any evidence that Microsoft suddenly figured out how to beat Apple at the tablet game. They failed when they tried to compete in portable music players, and they failed when they tried to compete in phones. Odds are they’re also going to fail to topple Apple in the tablet market.

Next time, I think Jesus should wait for the product to actually be released so he can see what the battery life is like, how it actually feels, whether the magical keyboard/trackpad case works, and what the price is. Then he can give it a whirl, and my guess is he could save 1,500 words claiming a unicorn has made a real thing obsolete.

Off to Vegas for the 2012 WSOP and lots of work

I’m writing this post from a plane somewhere over New Mexico, and I’m on my iPad, so this may not be the best-written or -formatted post I’ve ever written.

Anyway, I’m heading to Vegas for my annual trip to the World Series of Poker. This is the first year I’m staying in a condo instead of hotel hopping like I usually do. My typical routine is to hop back and forth from the luxurious Gold Coast to the Rio (where the WSOP happens) since they’re right across the street from each other. I will usually stay at the GC on the weekends (when it’s significantly cheaper than the Rio), and at the Rio during the week.

This year, I have a job, so I need a place where I can work without the sounds of slot machines and depression in the background, so I decided to rent a condo. I managed to talk Luckbox Larry into splitting it with me, so I’ll even have a roommate. The bottom line is we’ll probably both feel like we’re living in the lap of luxury since we’ll have our own rooms and, you know, the creature comforts like a fridge and oven. My guess is it’ll cost 30-50% more at the condo than it usually does I’m the hotels. But it’s hard to compare because we’ll have much better accommodations, WiFi, laundry, a gym and that sort of thing. All in all, I think it’s a good value.

Originally, I booked this trip so I could be here to promote the heads-up book, which we were trying to release before the WSOP Main Event, but that ain’t happening so I’m just here to work and pay poker this summer. When I say “work”, I really mean several things: my “day job”, of course; ShareAppeal, which is really getting rolling; writing a new book about my career so far (I’ve already written about 2,000 words since we took off); and editing the heads-up book so it’s ready to release later this year. I’m keeping pretty busy, as always.

But of course there’s poker too, right? I hope so. I don’t know how much I’ll be able to play with all the other stuff I have going on, but I’m going to at least try to play a few WSOP events and some side tournaments. I would like to play the Main Event again, but I have no idea if that’ll actually happen. Last year, I didn’t decide to play until about three hours before the beginning of Day 1 D (scroll down to Day 18), some still have about three weeks to figure out a way to play again this year.

We’re starting our descent, so I’m going to sign off. I don’t know if I’ll do a daily diary this year, but I’ll be sure to keep everyone up to date one what’s going on.

Oh! But I would like to give people a better sense of what the WSOP is like, and what it’s like for me every summer I Vegas. So, if you want to know more about that sort of thing, leave some comments with suggestions on what you want to know or see. I’ll do my best to create some content to give a sense of what it’s like out here at the WSOP.

The Satchel’s Grand-Reopening (recap)

Satchel’s is finally open again, and anyone who knows me knows I couldn’t wait to get back. So some friends and I went to get a deep dish, which was amazing, as always. Satchel asked us to keep it hush-hush until yesterday evening, so I waited until about 9:00 PM before I binge-tweeted a bunch of delicious pics.

Since it might be hard to find those pics on Twitter or Facebook later, I figured I should put them on the blog, too. So, here’s a recap of my visit to the Satchel’s Grand-Reopening (including the text from the original tweets).

Finally back at Satchel’s after MONTHS away. Satchel asked us to keep quiet till tonight, so I’m tweeting on delay!

Apparently Satchel’s has decided they don’t want to sell Dr. Pepper, soooo… REDACTED!!

The first deep dish anyone has ordered since Satchel’s reopened. And that’s Satchel (who Reagan is investigating).

Half “Super Hawaiian” – bacon, pineapple, ricotta, ham. Half “The Old Standby” – pepperoni, sausage, spinach, feta.

They remodeled Lightning Salvage! The left wall as you walk in (used to be the front bar) – yes, they built a booth.

They moved the bar to your right when you walk in, and knocked out a wall. The new bar is a horseshoe.

My expectations for Apple’s keynote at WWDC 2012

Last year, I wrote about WWDC 2011 ex post. But that’s pretty easy, right? Just follow the keynote and share my opinion on what was said. This year, I thought I’d try a little ex ante prognostication. Of course, there’s some risk that I’ll be wrong, but that’s a risk I’m willing to take. Plus, if anyone calls me out for missing my 2012 WWDC predictions, I can just point them to my piece from 2009 to regain some credibility 1. Speaking of that 2009 piece (and its “New Apple TV” prediction), let’s get to my expectations for WWDC 2012.

Apple TV software update

I may have had the wrong timeline when I predicted the “New Apple TV” (an Apple-branded TV), but I’m still clinging to that prediction. A big, big step in that direction will be opening up the Apple TV platform to third-party apps. I think one of the first apps will be HBO Go. Or at least I hope that’s one of the first ones.

Scoured from GameNGuide via Google Images

iOS 6

This is more or less a slam dunk unless Apple is hanging iOS 6 banners around WWDC as a really elaborate red herring. What will we see in iOS 6? I really don’t know, actually. Facebook integration seems to be heavily rumored. It seems like Siri is due for an update, and possibly a port to iPad.

Although I don’t think this is very likely, it’s time for a refresh of the OS itself. Maybe not a complete overhaul, but a pretty serious update to the UI. iOS is five years old now, and it’s starting to feel familiar. I think it’s still the best mobile OS (really, it’s one of the best OSes of any kind), but familiarity often breeds contempt, and it might be time to give the people something fresh.

But to be honest, I don’t expect huge changes in iOS 6. Better iCloud integration, Facebook integration, and small tweaks like that would fit Apple’s pattern of minor software updates in the years when there will be major hardware updates. This is the same pattern I wrote about last year2 when I said the iPhone 4S was still good enough, but that I expected Apple to really beef up iOS with iOS 5. This is a hardware year for iOS devices, so I don’t expect iOS to see a huge update.

I think we will see a huge update to Maps. This has been rumored for a while, and it looks like Google is taking proactive steps to differentiate their Maps product ahead of WWDC. I expect Apple to announce a totally in-house Apple Maps app, and I hope it offers turn-by-turn navigation (finally).

OS X Mountain Lion

We’ll finally get a really good look at what’s next for OS X. I expect to see a lot more iOS-like features showing up in OS X as the platforms continue to merge over the years. In 2010, Apple had an event called “Back to Mac“, signaling that their various platforms were going to become more coherent. That process is a difficult one, and it’s still very much happening. I expect to see iOS-like notifications, app integration (e.g., Twitter and Facebook integration in the OS itself), better iCloud integration, a heavier focus on the Mac App Store, and I’m sure there will be some general Ux improvements.

 

Speaking of iCloud

It’s time for iCloud to fly. Apple’s been pushing it for a while, but they still haven’t totally sunsetted MobileMe 3. I expect a lot more iCloud integration across Apple’s family of products. One of Apple’s biggest competitive advantages is the Apple ecosystem (“walled garden”), but it’s still not a totally wireless ecosystem.

Crazy prediction: Apple has a lot of new space in their data center. How about iCloud backup for OS X? I think it’s time we start seeing our data aggregated and refactored so we don’t have copies of all the same stuff everywhere.

What about the iPhone 5?

Not yet. I think iPhone 5 will be huge, but it won’t be out until September. It’s not typically Apple’s style to announce new iPhone hardware at WWDC, and I don’t think they’ll break from that this year. They have a lot of other cool stuff to talk about.

MacBooks

This is the thing I’m most looking forward to. I’m currently using a late-2008 15″ MacBook Pro, and I’m ready for some new duds. Don’t get me wrong, I love my MBP, but I want something new. It seems likely that Apple will discontinue the 17″ MBP, and roll out new, thinner MBPs all around. I’m not sure if all MBPs will become “MacBook Air-like” or if the MBP will just get much thinner, but I do expect a much thinner MBP to be announced.

It also seems like it’s time for “Retina” to come to MacBooks. The pixel-density doesn’t even need to be as good as iPad’s Retina display for it to work, so the technology is out there.

Now, we wait to see if I’m even remotely right. I might come back and do a recap of WWDC 2012 and how it aligns with my expectations, but that’s unlikely as I’m trying to get some big updates to ShareAppeal out the door.

Do I need to disclose that I own Apple stock? Or that I’m a serious Apple Fanboy? You already know that, right? Good.

ShareAppeal update: lots of new features!

A little while back, I announced the ShareAppeal beta. Since then, I’ve been hard at work on ShareAppeal, and I’m happy to announce several new features. You can find out a lot more on the ShareAppeal About page, but here’s a quick rundown:

  • Detailed user profiles now include a bio, website and location
  • Find other ShareAppeal users by searching for their name or scanning the Users Index
  • Follow other ShareAppeal users
  • Post links on your feed so your followers can see what you’re reading
  • Save links directly to your Reading List from your feed or by sharing with yourself–an easy way to save something for later if you don’t have time for it now
  • Comment on Posts and Shares within your network of followers
  • Invite friends to ShareAppeal and get an optional email when they sign up

I’m also working on several other features that I think will be really cool. For example, I’m working to integrate ShareAppeal with other social sites so that our friends on other sites can see what we’re sharing and talking about on ShareAppeal.

ShareAppeal has been a fun adventure so far, and I’m excited to give others the opportunity to come along for the ride. If you would like to participate in the beta, just click the link to get started. If you have any questions or want to know more, just leave a comment below. You can also Follow ShareAppeal on Twitter or like the ShareAppeal Facebook page for updates and new feature announcements.

If you would like to give ShareAppeal a try, just click here.

Satchel’s update!

For those of you who care about Satchel’s, and for those of you who are just curious about Satchel’s and my obsession with it, here’s an update. Satchel sent this email to the people who contributed something to the Satchel’s “Employee Relief Fund” via an IndieGoGo campaign a while back. I thought I would pass it along to update those people who care, but who didn’t give to the fund.

If you have no idea what I’m talking about, here is an article that talks about the fire that damaged the kitchen at Satchel’s.

And here’s the latest update email:

Hello! Please forgive me for waiting so long to reach out to you and say thanks for helping the Satchel’s employees! I have been working such long days, sometimes 16-18 hour days. My desk is piled high, my clothes need washing, my car needs cleaning but the restaurant re-model is moving along pretty good. The outpouring of support for our indiegogo campaign raising money for employees was incredible. I knew that folks loved our pizzas and salads and staff, but I had no idea that you loved us THIS much! It was humbling and kept me going through the hardest times.

It became apparent quickly after the fire that putting things back the way they were just wasn’t an option. Our tiny kitchen had 8 people working in there and there was very little space for the amount of food we were putting out. Also, in order to increase our occupancy to be more in line with the people we serve, we needed our “back door exit” to be through a hallway instead of through our prep room. The code doesn’t allow customers to exit through the kitchen so we’ve had to not only re-model the kitchen for more space, but also the prep room. We’ve combined these 2 rooms into one bigger connected kitchen and we feel we will have a better flow and more efficient kitchen, hopefully getting your food to you even faster, (notice I said “hopefully.”) The progress is good. Today the exterior walls were put on and tomorrow the electrician is supposed to start running the new electric. There is a lot to do but I am on it every day.

Those of you who got a perk of a cake made by my mom, I’ve already contacted you about how to begin the claim process for that. For the 2 of you that gave enough to get a painting or collage of mine, I will be in touch about that later. Basically my art show will go up in December and you’ll be able to pick from the paintings then. Those of you who gave enough for a menu-back, I’ll contact you when I get a little further along with the re-model and have some extra time. And for the majority of you who are waiting patiently for calzones and pizzas and salads, I’ll be sending out details of how to claim your food when we have a re-opening date. I would like to open for a couple days before the “official” opening to just feed those of you who gave to our campaign. But you’ll be able to come in any time and claim your perk after that as well. I’m still a but too swamped to figure it all out right now.

I just wanted to get out an email to say thanks to everyone for your gifts and your support. The employees were all so very happy and grateful. One employee told me how she cried when she saw the money show up in her account. I feel pretty sure that you’ll be seeing familiar happy faces when we re-open and all of us will be so glad to get a regular paycheck and a pizza again, especially me! I hope I get the chance to thank each of you in person when we re-open, as best I can tell I am hoping that we will be able to re-open in early June.

thank you thank you thank you.

satchel